hippy
Ex-Staff (retired)
Just above this there's a "Rate Thread" option ...
Unless something is really bad or a reader is having a particularly bad hair day I cannot see that many Poor or Terrible ratings being handed out. As a result most posts that do get rated get an instant 5 star award.
Not knowing the rating scheme, but based on sticky-star awards at school, one would also expect a one star 'terrible' rated article to have been judged somewhat more favourably than one which hadn't been rated.
I can see how the rating would work for other types of forum but, here, would rating get used more often and be more useful if the default no star were 'Unrated / Presumed Average', one star is better than average up to 5 stars, 'I want to have your children' ?
Code:
***** = Excellent
**** = Good
*** = Average
** = Poor
* = Terrible
Not knowing the rating scheme, but based on sticky-star awards at school, one would also expect a one star 'terrible' rated article to have been judged somewhat more favourably than one which hadn't been rated.
I can see how the rating would work for other types of forum but, here, would rating get used more often and be more useful if the default no star were 'Unrated / Presumed Average', one star is better than average up to 5 stars, 'I want to have your children' ?