So the next phase may be to run a poll to determine potential user interest.
Some form of more specific detail on your proposal will be needed
What features will you include that makes it more using that products already available?
Okay, let me see if I can give and idea where I'm coming from and what I did to resolve it.
I had some previous Microprocessor experience, some Arduino based Microcontroler experience and some FPGA/CPLD experience too. The idea of the PICAXE was appealing and as I researched it, it seemed it might an ideal platform for 'quickie' projects which actually made up most of what I did. So I ordered up a handful of 8, 14 and 20 pin devices and went Rev Ed's site to see what they offered to help get me started. Well, they had a good array of stuff but by the time I had enough to work with all the chips, I'd need several boards, yet another propriety cable, or a small handful of bits and pieces, that cable and a breadboard. Since my goal was cheap, cheerful and quick neither of these routes seemed ideal. I eventually opted for a small dedicated breadboard with the usual resistors and diode and a modified serial cable. However, this did not seem ideal either. It was a bit of a kludge, I regularly ran out of space on the little breadboard and had to tie in others with jumpers anyway. After a few dozen projects and all the popping of ICs in and out of the breadboard, it started to get unreliable. Also, more than once, I bent the pins on the PICAXE I was using. During all this an idea dawned on me. Why not just build a little board that resolves most of these issues and use it. So this is what I came up with:
The benefits of this were:
- Smaller size
- Uses a common cable I already have (serial or a very cheap USB to serial) and can be used with other things
- ZIF socket to reduce wear and tear on the ICs and the board
- Works with 8, 14 and 20 pin ICs
- Built in regulator to work with cheap DC wall-warts that I can also use with my other MCU/FPGA/CPLD boards
- Still provides access to all the signals
- Quick and easy to set-up, easy to handle and a lot more reliable
When others saw it, they wanted one. It seemed to appeal to most of the folks I showed it to so I decided to get the thing put on a PCB.
Here is the result:
It has the advantage of being even smaller than the prototype and can be sold for under 7 quid fully assembled. It uses all through hole devices so can be easily assembled by someone with minimal soldering skills and could be provided as a board only, a kit, or fully assembled.
I have also done up the design for a "Model 2" that is laid out in a very similar way, and has allowance for regulated DC input, a bigger regulator (like the prototype) and the ability to directly attach and supply power to 3 wire devices like servos and those little 'brick' sensors, switches and other devices. I will have the same design philosophy as the "Model 1" as will all my designs. I have similar projects for the Arduino world too.
So, 2 questions for you all.
1) Would something like this be of interest at all?
2) someone mentioned that this sort of thing had been tried before and failed. Do you have insight as to why they failed?
Thanks in advance to anyone that can give some feedback. I'd also like to find a couple of good folks to receive a free bare board, build it up and let me know what thoughts they have on it.