​ ​ ​ ​ PICAXE not in Space
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: PICAXE not in Space

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cardiff,UK
    Posts
    4,207

    Default PICAXE not in Space

    $50SAT the PICAXE powered PocketQube satellite has recently returned home, as you can see if you try to track its current location;

    http://www.satview.org/?sat_id=39436U

    With a de-orbit window of 2 hours, we have no idea where its remains ended up.

    It was fun.

    There are now no PICAXEs in space that I am aware of.
    Picaxe in Space is now Silent (but probably still running)
    http://www.50dollarsat.info/

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Athens, GREECE
    Posts
    495

    Default

    It was an amazing project.
    When is the second picaxe satellite scheduled to fly?
    ~stelios

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cardiff,UK
    Posts
    4,207

    Default

    A PICAXE was used as a radio beacon for the Tupod launch from the ISS;

    https://www.gaussteam.com/tupod-depl...ss-astronauts/

    I wrote the code for that, it de-orbited in a couple of weeks.
    Picaxe in Space is now Silent (but probably still running)
    http://www.50dollarsat.info/

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Athens, GREECE
    Posts
    495

    Default

    Who would thought that a PicAxe and interpreted Basic language would be used for space experiments!
    I also recall this project here using a Picaxe 18X in a PongSat sent to the edge of space: Picaxe based Satellite PongSat 18X
    ~stelios

  5. #5

    Default

    Yes, it was a fascinating project.
    @srnet - I am intrigued know how they were able to track such a small device and determine when it fell to Earth, long after it had gone silent?
    Or was it just theory, based on the orbit it had been on? (I think this unlikely if the estimate was accurate to +/- 1hr?).

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cardiff,UK
    Posts
    4,207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dartmoor View Post
    Yes, it was a fascinating project.
    @srnet - I am intrigued know how they were able to track such a small device and determine when it fell to Earth, long after it had gone silent?
    Or was it just theory, based on the orbit it had been on? (I think this unlikely if the estimate was accurate to +/- 1hr?).
    It was tracked by NORAD, orbital perameters updated weekly.

    There was some dispute before launch as to whether NORAD could track something so small, but I was since it had a radio beacon I was able to get an accurate fix on it with a directional antenna. The fix I got was within 2 seconds of its position as predicted by NORAD.

    These days the FCC in America will not apparently give permission for satellites smaller than a cubsat (10cm cube) due to the difficulty of tracking them, despite the obvious evidence that they can track something 1/8th that size just fine.

    The tracking is not continous, and accurate predictions of the exact timing of a de-orbit are not possible.
    Picaxe in Space is now Silent (but probably still running)
    http://www.50dollarsat.info/

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,882

    Default

    Hi,

    Quote Originally Posted by srnet View Post
    the FCC in America will not apparently give permission for satellites smaller than a cubsat (10cm cube) due to the difficulty of tracking them, despite the obvious evidence that they can track something 1/8th that size just fine.
    Yes, Radar uses "millimeter wavelengths" so at least "military grade" equipment should be able to track anything significantly larger than that. The only issue with a (metal) cube is that its flat sides may reflect the radio waves away in other directions, rather than returning them directly to the (Radar) transmitter. But small satellites are not going to have a stabilised orientation, so will tumble and at least sometimes be "visible" (to Radar, if not optically).

    However, to predict the time (let alone location) of "re-entry" is very difficult because of the unpredictable drag of the upper atmosphere. The Humanity Star satellite re-entered about 5 times sooner than intended/expected, because of its elliptical orbit (i.e. briefly dipping into the upper atmosphere once each orbit) and its unusually large diameter to weight (i.e. drag/mass) ratio.

    Cheers, Alan.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •