​ ​ ​ ​ M3 or X3 series
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: M3 or X3 series

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    125

    Default M3 or X3 series

    I know this has more than likely been asked somewhere else before.

    Is Rev Ed working on another Picaxe release. i.e. An M3 or X3 series?

    I do understand that this is all dependent on the hardware available to do the work.

    It would just be great if Picaxe had 12bit or > resolution on ADC and could perform integer maths. Plus had a larger range of Interrupts to choose from etc.

    I know that Picaxe is for educational purposes. But lets face it....I think that Picaxe has also become very recognized as a hobby micro as well.

    Just from looking through the archives of code snippets. There are some rather indepth and complex projects out there. And in some part; there complexity exceeds that of the level of most general users of other code formats.

    If the hardware was/is available for Rev Ed to use on a newer series of Picaxe. I am sure that many of us would spend the extra for the extra functionality of a X3 or M3 chip.

    I have so many project that are Picaxe based; that I could not be bothered going to another micro format.

    And for the most part; I have worked around Picaxe's limitations. But I do get frustrated from time to time, when trying to accomplish something that would be far easier on
    another micro control.

    What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Athens, GREECE
    Posts
    495
    ~stelios

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchbox View Post
    It would just be great if Picaxe had 12bit or > resolution on ADC
    A 12 or greater bit A/D with a 5 or 3.3 volt input range is a very sensitive animal. If you want more than 10 bit resolution I suggest using an external A/D chip and taking all the necessary design and layout/construction precautions to avoid (digital) noise and other issues affecting the measurement.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    758

    Default

    Say why. If it's speed then search free pic basic compiler. I did.
    The pics picaxe use is limited to m2 and x2. I would only use 28x2 cos prog space and ram but also maths.
    I can program all avr arduino boards using free basic compiler..it prints the basic line then the asm if you want.
    Other picaxe users are ont their forum.
    I would ask myself why first. Do you want to write a retro video game on a small glcd?
    Thing that got to me with picaxe is limited variables and needing peek,poke and no long vars and other missing stuff.
    Because of the picaxe speed,software solutions for missing maths is pointless.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stan74 View Post
    Say why.
    Thing that got to me with picaxe is limited variables and needing peek,poke and no long vars and other missing stuff.
    Because of the picaxe speed,software solutions for missing maths is pointless.
    It doesn't just come down to speed for the maths, side of things. Its also about the added simplicity in the writing of the algorithm.

    And I do agree with you very much so; on the limited variables.

    And before anyone says it.
    I am totally aware of work around's for all these things. But it just takes more time in the writing of the program; adds more complexity; takes up more memory and requires more debugging in some cases.

    I like to write programs that have a very high level of redundancy; and can take into account almost any problem that may occur in the hardware or its function. Due to many of them being designed for real world situation, that are not always monitored.

    For me; debugging complex sensory functions, can consume a lot of time. So the more that is done behind the scenes, the less I have to focus on in the foreground of the code.


    Hope that explains the general idea Stan.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Judging from the views of the post, and know more reply's. I am assuming that people agree with my statements on why I personally would appreciate a Picaxe hardware/software upgrade.
    I understand that this would be costly for Rev Ed to accomplish; and that it may not be economical with as many other micro's around as are at the present time.

    Any tech moderators care to post on the likely hood of an M3 or X3 series of picaxe's being release at any point.

    Or will picaxe eventually fade away?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cheshire, England
    Posts
    2,486
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchbox View Post
    ... Or will picaxe eventually fade away?
    I think not.

    Although the firmware is slow and the BASIC limited, PICAXE is still the easiest to use, and virtually un-brickable.

    By keeping in-house control of all aspects of the PICAXE architecture ( a bit like Apple used to be ) customers of Rev-Ed know that whatever they buy will do just what it says on the tin. No problems with mismatched hardware and software.

    Attributes like these are attractive to their main customer base, which is education, so Rev-Ed have little need to bring out an X3, unless they want to enter the fray and compete with $1 A*****o boards from China.

    We may wish for an X3, but don't hold your breath.

    Cheers,

    Buzby

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    4,466

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchbox View Post
    Any tech moderators care to post on the likely hood of an M3 or X3 series of picaxe's being release at any point.

    To second Buzby, don't hold your breath. Going on past experience (X1s, X2s and M2s), new models will be announced when they're ready for market. Also, since RevEd's primary market is the British education system, they will probably have to be backward compatible with the existing range.

    Now that PE6 is done and dusted, I'm hoping that a 28-pin PIC32-based is on the way, with an enhanced mathematics option. My other dream is to have functionality independent of specific pins but that depends on the underlying PIC silicon's capability. And ~sigh~ RevEd has to see any new products as commercially viable.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by inglewoodpete View Post
    Now that PE6 is done and dusted, I'm hoping that a 28-pin PIC32-based is on the way, with an enhanced mathematics option.
    Oh, yes, that would be EXCELLENT! I find myself hitting program capacity limits more and more often as I continue to work with PICAXE and spend ridiculous amounts of time trying to optimise my BASIC code to fit the PICAXE chips. If I overflow then I am forced to swap to PIC32MX170 with their 32-bit architecture and 256K flash and 64K RAM and load in Micromite BASIC. My preference is for the PICAXE code every time but limits are limits!

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    758

    Default

    IF! you have to to use BASIC to program a 8 bit atmega or pic, including the new ones with programmable pins...in fact you have to set them up with a pps tool, ...
    google "a free pic basic compiler"
    I got one that does arduino and pic, it's open source. it compiles to optimised machine code hex but the programmer support is top. arduino boards it's just usb lead, no pickit 2 or 3.
    I did try picaxe first and don't regret it but I wanted more than picaxe can do without resorting to c++

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •