This absurdly clever "light painting" thermal imaging hack should be very Picaxable => http://www.maxjusticz.com/light-painting-with-temperature/
Well, if the shoe fits.... I proclaim that as pretty damn awesome.Yuk! I just knew someone would respond with the word "awesome"
More or less, but the color of the object can only affect the intensity of the reflected light, it can't affect the color (LED's have narrow emission spectra) so the effect may not be terrible compared to the other approximations. I take issue with "an infrared thermometer that reads the average temperature over a small area", hmmm, that sensor has a 90 degree viewing angle so you have to be pretty close to the object to be imaging a small area.Clever ? - Yes.
Practical ? - I'm not sure.
The light that the 'real' camera collects is not just dependent on the RGB emitted by the LEDs, it is affected by the colour of the target as well.
So two objects at the same temperature, but different reflectances, will appear as different temperatures.
Or have I missed something ?
A black object, even if it is 'hot', will not reflect any visible colour. It will appear 'dark' no matter what RGB is shining on it.... but the color of the object can only affect the intensity of the reflected light, it can't affect the color ...
Yes, but I still can't see the point.Regardless it's pretty ingenious, and the guy can be justifiably proud of it.
True, but black isn't one of the colors so it's somewhat obvious that a black area isn't measured.A black object, even if it is 'hot', will not reflect any visible colour. It will appear 'dark' no matter what RGB is shining on it.
Well, you could figure out if the dog was sleeping on the bed when you were outYes, but I still can't see the point.
Different strokes. Perhaps not a "must have" for everyone, but a fabulously creative idea, and a great example of fresh, "outside the box" thinking. I really like it.Yes, but I still can't see the point.
That is were I am at with the project. It isn't designed to replace a commercial detector, but I give the guy tons of street cred for coming up with a concept that is, well; pretty damn cool.Different strokes. Perhaps not a "must have" for everyone, but a fabulously creative idea, and a great example of fresh, "outside the box" thinking. I really like it.
WHY does this matter? emissivity_tableAs a standard, the MLX90614 is calibrated for an object emissivity of 1.
It's looks like a fun project to consume an entire Arduino, a $20 sensor, and lots of colored LEDS, but other than that it will not stand up to even cursory engineering scrutiny."Blackbody radiation" or "cavity radiation" refers to an object or system which absorbs all radiation incident upon it and re-radiates energy which is characteristic of this radiating system only, not dependent upon the type of radiation which is incident upon it. The radiated energy can be considered to be produced by standing wave or resonant modes of the cavity which is radiating.
I seem to recall that one of my old Nissan automobiles used a hot-wire airflow (mass) meter as part of the input to the fuel injection computer... apparently, this has better response time than thermistors.<...>
... finding tiny bead thermistors is sometimes hard and mounting them by their tiny wires is delicate... If you want air flow fluctuations as well as temperature variations you can run the thermistor hot by self heating...
Britianna states that Langley's most sophisticated platinum bolometer could...
I haven't looked at wikipedia for bolometers but I bet that's fun too... {"To measure the heat from a polar bear's seat at a half a kilometer..." as well as moon temperatures}... Happy New Year Ray...
But... Wikipedia (to have the last word) statesChanges in temperature as small as 0.0001° C may be detected in this way.
*3: http://www.hao.ucar.edu/education/bios/langley.phpBy 1880, Langley's bolometer was refined enough to detect thermal radiation from a cow a quarter of a mile away.[3]