Although a past topic on this Forum <A href='http://www.rev-ed.co.uk/picaxe/forum/topic.asp?topic_id=2814&forum_id=17&Topic_Title=Parity+problem&forum_title=PICAXE+Forum&M=False ' Target=_Blank>External Web Link</a>, there's a very lucid account (perhaps dated?)at => www.riccibitti.com/tinyplanet/tiny_article.htm <A href='http://www.riccibitti.com/tinyplanet/tiny_article.htm ' Target=_Blank>External Web Link</a> of cellular SMS/micro linking. It's been organised by 2 Italians for a Tiny12 micro & old Ericsson T10 <b>+ a commercial data cable </b> (often costly), but a glance shows the setup could be "Picaxable".
PP (= Pre Picaxes!) I did considerable fiddling with such cell phones myself, & found their specialised connectors a real pain to emulate with paper clips & hot melt glue! Although some like the Y2K era 9600bps M-BUS Nokias were simpler & more receptive to mods,the best approach for others (such as abundant early Ericssons) was to bypass the external conductive pads totally & solder directly to the internals.Yikes- naturally this ruined the phone for normal use & at the time (2001)was too costly to consider. However 5 years on such golden oldies clutter up desk drawers & are probably free to a good home.
Ozzie's own 'Silicon Chip" had a great couple of Nokia SMS controller articles late 2004 in fact => www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_102994/article.html <A href='http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_102994/article.html ' Target=_Blank>External Web Link</a>
Aside from their different bit protocols, mono Nokia 51xx/61xx etc M-BUS oldies still look the most receptive, especially since slow 9600bps data rates aren't an SMS worry. The tolerant Picaxe serial may let you even neglect a MAX-232 ?! There's a very lucid M-BUS interfacing account => www.mbarron.net/mbus/ <A href='http://www.mbarron.net/mbus/ ' Target=_Blank>External Web Link</a>.
<b> Given global SMS/txt coverage, such Picaxe-SMS linking seems well worth exploring, perhaps for enthusiasts/students searching for a decent, but CHEAP, Picaxe project. </b> Stan
Extra: Yes- I've played with the inbuilt AT style modem on 2005 era Sony Ericsson K700i etc, but these swish SE cell phones are still too good to dedicate just to an SMS project...
Edited by - stan. swan on 02/05/2006 05:44:56
PP (= Pre Picaxes!) I did considerable fiddling with such cell phones myself, & found their specialised connectors a real pain to emulate with paper clips & hot melt glue! Although some like the Y2K era 9600bps M-BUS Nokias were simpler & more receptive to mods,the best approach for others (such as abundant early Ericssons) was to bypass the external conductive pads totally & solder directly to the internals.Yikes- naturally this ruined the phone for normal use & at the time (2001)was too costly to consider. However 5 years on such golden oldies clutter up desk drawers & are probably free to a good home.
Ozzie's own 'Silicon Chip" had a great couple of Nokia SMS controller articles late 2004 in fact => www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_102994/article.html <A href='http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_102994/article.html ' Target=_Blank>External Web Link</a>
Aside from their different bit protocols, mono Nokia 51xx/61xx etc M-BUS oldies still look the most receptive, especially since slow 9600bps data rates aren't an SMS worry. The tolerant Picaxe serial may let you even neglect a MAX-232 ?! There's a very lucid M-BUS interfacing account => www.mbarron.net/mbus/ <A href='http://www.mbarron.net/mbus/ ' Target=_Blank>External Web Link</a>.
<b> Given global SMS/txt coverage, such Picaxe-SMS linking seems well worth exploring, perhaps for enthusiasts/students searching for a decent, but CHEAP, Picaxe project. </b> Stan
Extra: Yes- I've played with the inbuilt AT style modem on 2005 era Sony Ericsson K700i etc, but these swish SE cell phones are still too good to dedicate just to an SMS project...
Edited by - stan. swan on 02/05/2006 05:44:56