Should Rev-Ed get around to an update to AXEpad may I request some attention to the ini file/options arrangements?
It is a great program, just as useful for me as the Windows version, and much easier to set up the USB port. However, there are options in the ini file that are not on the options menu (e.g. width of code explorer pane). Also, there are options that are hard to use on the GUI and when set in the ini file, just revert to a system default for a reason that I can't fathom (e.g. choice of font). And why not use Courier or another fixed width font by default? Code layout is a mess with variable fonts.
The ini file, for those that haven't found it, is a hidden text file (axepad.ini in directory home/.LinAXEpad). Edit with care.
An alternative to Rev-Ed doing the work would be to issue the AXEpad GUI under the GPL, then we could all do the cosmetic stuff leaving Rev-Ed to do the hard bit in the engine. Just a thought!
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 on this machine with two screens and it's great!
It is a great program, just as useful for me as the Windows version, and much easier to set up the USB port. However, there are options in the ini file that are not on the options menu (e.g. width of code explorer pane). Also, there are options that are hard to use on the GUI and when set in the ini file, just revert to a system default for a reason that I can't fathom (e.g. choice of font). And why not use Courier or another fixed width font by default? Code layout is a mess with variable fonts.
The ini file, for those that haven't found it, is a hidden text file (axepad.ini in directory home/.LinAXEpad). Edit with care.
An alternative to Rev-Ed doing the work would be to issue the AXEpad GUI under the GPL, then we could all do the cosmetic stuff leaving Rev-Ed to do the hard bit in the engine. Just a thought!
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 on this machine with two screens and it's great!